From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DE VITO v. KNETTEL

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 23, 1961
32 Misc. 2d 656 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)

Opinion

May 23, 1961

Appeal from the City Court of Long Beach, Nassau County, ABRAHAM SCHLISSEL, J.

Jules B. St. Germain for appellant.

John E. Morris and Louis M. Schachter for respondent.


The purported verdict was recorded as follows: "The jury believes there was negligence on both sides but the greater negligence was contributed by Mr. Knettel, therefore awarding Mr. De Vito the sum of $750." The foregoing does not constitute a general verdict within the meaning of section 458 of the Civil Practice Act and the court should have directed the jury to return for further deliberation and bring in a proper verdict. ( Conrey v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 73 App. Div. 518; Swift v. Fairyland Park, 2 Misc.2d 155; Savko v. Brooklyn Queens Tr. Corp., 166 Misc. 84, affd. App. Term, 2d Dept., Jan. 15, 1938; Klepper v. Seymour House Corp., 246 N.Y. 85, 95; Warner v. New York Cent. R.R. Co., 52 N.Y. 437; Bourcier v. Peryor, 267 App. Div. 932.)

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion for a new trial granted.

Concur — DI GIOVANNA, BENJAMIN and DALY, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

DE VITO v. KNETTEL

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 23, 1961
32 Misc. 2d 656 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
Case details for

DE VITO v. KNETTEL

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH DE VITO, Appellant, v. WILLIAM KNETTEL, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1961

Citations

32 Misc. 2d 656 (N.Y. App. Term 1961)
218 N.Y.S.2d 735

Citing Cases

Heath v. Thurmon

The jury was not released or discharged, and the issues in the cases were still in their hands for…