From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

de Enamorado v. Central American Steamship Agency, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 3, 1990
160 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 3, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Dontzin, J.).


The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendants' motion for a protective order. Plaintiff made the minimal required showing that the requested discovery of Victory could adduce facts establishing New York as a proper forum for this action. Since such facts would aid plaintiff in her opposition to the motion to dismiss, the court properly adjourned that motion until after completion of discovery.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Asch, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

de Enamorado v. Central American Steamship Agency, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 3, 1990
160 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

de Enamorado v. Central American Steamship Agency, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA A.R. DE ENAMORADO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
553 N.Y.S.2d 152

Citing Cases

Garmendia v. O'Neill

The court also properly declined to adjourn the motion to dismiss until after completion of discovery.…