From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DE BARDELEBEN v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 15, 1917
75 So. 629 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)

Opinion

6 Div. 303.

May 15, 1917.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Wm. E. Fort, Judge.

Emma DeBardeleben was convicted of grand larceny, and she appeals. Affirmed.

R.L. Williams, of Birmingham, for appellant. W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The defendant was tried on an indictment in two counts, one count charging grand larceny and the other charging receiving stolen property, was convicted of grand larceny, and from the judgment appeals.

The transcript fails to set out the general charge of the court or the written charges given at the request of defendant; and in their absence this court will not consider the refused charges. Acts 1915, p. 815.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

DE BARDELEBEN v. STATE

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 15, 1917
75 So. 629 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
Case details for

DE BARDELEBEN v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:DE BARDELEBEN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 15, 1917

Citations

75 So. 629 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
16 Ala. App. 81

Citing Cases

Denton v. State

For aught appearing they may have been substantially covered by written instructions which were given at the…

DEES v. STATE

Where record does not contain all of accused's given requested charges the appellate court will presume that…