From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Araujo v. Stem Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 1994
207 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 19, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.


The plaintiff provided evidence at trial that because of injuries sustained in an automobile accident with the appellant Wa P. Law, he was unable to return to work as a cab driver. Approximately 17 months after the accident, the plaintiff took a job which did not require him to sit for extended periods of time. Contrary to the argument of the defendants, the plaintiff's evidence was sufficient to establish a prima facie case of "serious injury" under Insurance Law § 5102 (d) which prevented him from performing his usual and customary daily activities for not less than 90 of the 180 days following the occurrence (see, Gant v. Sparacino, 203 A.D.2d 515). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

De Araujo v. Stem Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 19, 1994
207 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

De Araujo v. Stem Cab Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DONATO F. DE ARAUJO, Respondent, v. STEM CAB CORP. et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 639

Citing Cases

Kennedy v. Barry

Amato opined that plaintiff was unable to undertake substantially all of his customary and daily activities…

Kaplan v. Gak

The plaintiff Samuel Kaplan was allegedly injured in a two-vehicle collision with the defendant. Kaplan's…