From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Wilcoxson

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Aug 10, 2017
81 N.E.3d 1265 (Ohio 2017)

Opinion

No. 2017–0663.

08-10-2017

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILCOXSON.


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a request for reinstatement by respondent, Clinton Ralph Wilcoxson II. The request was not opposed.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the request is granted and that respondent, Clinton Ralph Wilcoxson II, Attorney Registration No. 0061974, last known address in Vandalia, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Ohio. It is further ordered that the reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 4} For earlier case, see Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wilcoxson, 150 Ohio St.3d 1274, 2017-Ohio-4206, 81 N.E.3d 1259.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and O'DONNELL, KENNEDY, FRENCH, O'NEILL, FISCHER, and DeWINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Wilcoxson

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Aug 10, 2017
81 N.E.3d 1265 (Ohio 2017)
Case details for

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Wilcoxson

Case Details

Full title:DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. WILCOXSON.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Date published: Aug 10, 2017

Citations

81 N.E.3d 1265 (Ohio 2017)
81 N.E.3d 1265
2017 Ohio 7157

Citing Cases

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Wilcoxson

On August 10, 2017, we reinstated his license to practice law without terminating the pending disciplinary…