From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 9, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 888 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

April 9, 1959

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, SYLVESTER F. SABBATINO, J.

Held, Telchin Held ( Edward F. Doran, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Wilfrid E. Marrin for respondents in Actions No. 3 and No. 4.

No one appearing for respondents in Actions No. 1 and No. 2.


The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to appellant, and motion to consolidate granted, without costs. Respondents failed to show that consolidation would prejudice a substantial right. ( Shea v. Benjamin, 275 App. Div. 1003; Kelly v. John Vogel, Inc., 279 App. Div. 797; Tammany v. Bloom, 5 A.D.2d 996.) The possibility that the action originally brought in the City Court might be settled and the Municipal Court actions severed and returned to the Municipal Court is no present valid basis for denying consolidation.

Concur — PETTE, DI GIOVANNA and BENJAMIN, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Davis v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 9, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 888 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Davis v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DAVIS et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT WILLIAMS, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1959

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 888 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
191 N.Y.S.2d 731