From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 26, 1983
425 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-260.

January 26, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lake County, C. Welborn Daniel, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael B. Jones, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The trial judge did not err in denying appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal because there was competent evidence identifying appellant as the perpetrator of the crime charged. The fact that the evidence is in conflict does not entitle appellant to a judgment of acquittal because the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses is for the jury. Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 1981); Streeter v. State, 400 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Error, if any, in rejecting the deposition testimony of a witness to contradict the witness' testimony at trial is harmless, because the witness testified to substantially what the deposition testimony would have shown. The judgment of conviction is

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 26, 1983
425 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES SHEPPARD DAVIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 26, 1983

Citations

425 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Wilkins v. State

If there is competent substantial evidence of each element of the crime and that the defendant was the…

State v. Powell

The trial judge does not weigh the evidence. See Davis v. State, 425 So.2d 654 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983);…