From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jul 6, 1926
109 So. 301 (Fla. 1926)

Opinion

Opinion Filed July 6, 1926.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Highlands County; W. J. Parker, Judge.

Reversed.

R. E. Hamrick and B. J. Hamrick, for Plaintiff in Error;

J. B. Johnson, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for Defendant in Error.


The defendant in error was convicted in the Circuit Court of Highlands County of the offense of the larceny of a cow and was sentenced to serve two years in State Prison for such offense.

From such conviction he sued out writ of error.

The transcript of the record fails to show arraignment or plea.

An examination of the evidence as contained in the record discloses that there was no proof that the cow which was alleged to have been the subject of larceny was taken, if at all, by the defendant without the consent of the owner. In cases of larceny it is necessary that every essential ingredient of the crime be proven by some evidence and that such evidence must be sufficient to establish every essential element against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt before a conviction may lawfully be had. Sykes v. State, 78 Fla. 167, 82 South. Rep. 778; Albritton v. State, 81 Fla. 684, 88 South. Rep. 623. Upon the authority of the opinions in the cases above cited this case should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial, and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

BROWN, C. J., AND ELLIS AND STRUM, J. J., concur in the opinion.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jul 6, 1926
109 So. 301 (Fla. 1926)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:JESS DAVIS, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Jul 6, 1926

Citations

109 So. 301 (Fla. 1926)
109 So. 301

Citing Cases

Jones v. State

It is established law that the burden of proof rests on the State of Florida to establish every essential…

G.A.D. v. State

Therefore, the juvenile's right to due process of law was violated. See: Albritton v. State, 81 Fla. 684, 88…