From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Selina Dev. Corp. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 2003
302 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

283

February 25, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi, J.), entered on or about April 13, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to liability upon his Labor Law § 240(1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Neil F. Schreffler, for plaintiff-respondent.

Peter James Johnson, Jr., for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Gonzalez, JJ.


Plaintiff, by adducing evidence that, while performing renovation work in the basement of a building owned by defendant Selina Development Corporation of New York, he fell from an unsecured ladder, set forth a prima facie case of liability under Labor Law § 240(1) (see Yurkovich v. Kvarner Woodworking, 289 A.D.2d 183), and since Selina has, in opposition to plaintiff's motion, "offered nothing more than mere speculation as to what might have occurred," the award of summary judgment in plaintiff's favor was appropriate (Wise v. 141 McDonald Ave., LLC., 297 A.D.2d 515, 516).

Selina's various arguments to the contrary are unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Davis v. Selina Dev. Corp. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 25, 2003
302 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Davis v. Selina Dev. Corp. of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD DAVIS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SELINA DEVELOPMENT CORP. OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 25, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 872

Citing Cases

Velasco v. Green-Wood Cemetery

Defendants argue that the ladder was in no way defective, and that the only cause of the accident was…

SAFT v. 111 CHELSEA, LLC

It is uncontested that the ladder was unsecured in any way. The fact that the ladder was unsecured…