From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 11, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00677-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 11, 2014)

Summary

finding a delay of over four months to be unreasonable

Summary of this case from McMillian v. SafePoint Ins. Co.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00677-BAJ-RLB

08-11-2014

CYNTHIA DAVIS v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA


RULING AND ORDER

Before the Court is a Motion to Compel Appraisal Pursuant to the Terms of Plaintiff's Homeowner's Policy and to Stay the Case Pending the Conclusion of the Appraisal Process (Doc. 7), filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America ("Safeco"). Plaintiff Cynthia Davis ("Davis") opposes the motion. (Doc. 8.) Safeco filed a reply memorandum. (Doc. 11.)

On March 27, 2014, United States Magistrate Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. issued a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), recommending that Safeco's motion be denied. (Doc. 16.)

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation specifically notified the Safeco that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), it had fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. (Doc. 16, p. 1.) A review of the record indicates that Safeco did not file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Having carefully considered Safeco's motion, Davis' memorandum in opposition, Safeco's reply memorandum, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America's Motion to Compel Appraisal Pursuant to the Terms of Plaintiff's Homeowner's Policy and to Stay the Case Pending the Conclusion of the Appraisal Process (Doc. 7) is DENIED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this11th day of August, 2014

/s/_________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Davis v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 11, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00677-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 11, 2014)

finding a delay of over four months to be unreasonable

Summary of this case from McMillian v. SafePoint Ins. Co.
Case details for

Davis v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA DAVIS v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 11, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00677-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 11, 2014)

Citing Cases

McMillian v. SafePoint Ins. Co.

Marquette v. S. Fid. Ins. Co., No. 14-2311, 2015 WL 13529953, at *3 (E.D. La. May 19, 2015) (Zainey, J.)…

Bledsoe v. Am. Nat'l Prop. & Cas. Co.

Davis v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., No. 13-677, 2014 WL 3939809, at *4 (M.D. La. Aug. 12, 2014) (internal…