From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Nelson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 21, 1960
285 F.2d 214 (4th Cir. 1960)

Opinion

No. 8197.

Argued November 18, 1960.

Decided November 21, 1960.

Burt M. Morewitz, Newport News, Va., on brief for appellant.

Harry E. McCoy, Norfolk, Va. (Seawell, McCoy, Winston Dalton, Rixey Rixey, William B. Eley and Carter B.S. Furr, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellees.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.


The District Court dismissed, for laches, the libel of the present appellant, a longshoreman who sustained injuries in 1949, but did not bring his action against the ship until 1956.

As this delay of nearly seven years exceeds any possibly applicable limitations period, it became the duty of the libellant to plead and prove facts negativing a presumption of prejudice from inexcusable delay. The presumption would be against prejudice if suit had been brought during the legal period of limitations. No allegations were made in the libel in an effort to illuminate the issue, but the court held a hearing, at which there was no showing sufficient to excuse or justify the delay, or to negative prejudice.

For the reasons stated in the District Court's opinion, 190 F. Supp. 137, the order of dismissal is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Davis v. Nelson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 21, 1960
285 F.2d 214 (4th Cir. 1960)
Case details for

Davis v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:Billie DAVIS, Appellant, v. Ernest Harold NELSON, a non-resident…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 21, 1960

Citations

285 F.2d 214 (4th Cir. 1960)

Citing Cases

Randall v. Mayor City Council of Baltimore

When a claim is brought after the analogous limitations period has run there is a presumption in favor of…

Dawson v. Fernley & Eger

Czaplicki v. The SS Hoegh Silvercloud, supra. In addition to the authorities cited to support this point in…