From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Meese

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 27, 1989
865 F.2d 592 (3d Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1687.

Argued January 10, 1989.

Decided January 27, 1989.

Stephen F. Gold (Argued), Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Vaughan Finn (Argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ.Div., Washington, D.C., Virginia R. Powel, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Atty's. Office, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 86-2467).

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, COWEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


The judgment of the district court will be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Van Artstalen, reported at 692 F. Supp. 505 (E.D.Pa. 1988).


Summaries of

Davis v. Meese

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 27, 1989
865 F.2d 592 (3d Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Davis v. Meese

Case Details

Full title:DAVIS, JOEL R., ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 1989

Citations

865 F.2d 592 (3d Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Siefken v. Village of Arlington Heights

And the Third Circuit sustained an FBI regulation prohibiting diabetics from being employed as special…

Hogarth v. Thornburgh

For similar reasons, a court has held that an insulin-dependent diabetic was properly excluded from a…