From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Jefferson Reg'l Med. Ctr. Preferred Provider Org.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jan 10, 2017
No. 5:16-cv-262-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 10, 2017)

Opinion

No. 5:16-cv-262-DPM

01-10-2017

LEE ANDREW DAVIS PLAINTIFF v. JEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER PREFERRED PROVIDER ORGANIZATION; WALTER JOHNSON; DAVID NIXON; JOHN DOES, 1-20; and JEFFERSON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., d/b/a Jefferson Regional Medical Center DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Dr. Davis's retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 is dismissed with prejudice. His Arkansas Civil Rights Act and Arkansas Freedom of Information Act claims are dismissed without prejudice.

/s/_________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

10 January 2017


Summaries of

Davis v. Jefferson Reg'l Med. Ctr. Preferred Provider Org.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jan 10, 2017
No. 5:16-cv-262-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 10, 2017)
Case details for

Davis v. Jefferson Reg'l Med. Ctr. Preferred Provider Org.

Case Details

Full title:LEE ANDREW DAVIS PLAINTIFF v. JEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER PREFERRED…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Jan 10, 2017

Citations

No. 5:16-cv-262-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 10, 2017)

Citing Cases

Caruso v. St. Louis

These allegations are also insufficient to establish a causal connection. See, e.g., Davis v. Johnson, 2017…