Opinion
11572N Index 656346/18
05-28-2020
James DAVIS II, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. INFLUX CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants–Appellants. Richmond Capital Group, LLC, et al., Defendants.
Jacobowitz Newman Tversky LLP, Cedarhurst (Evan M. Newman of counsel), for appellants. Colonna Cohen law, PLLC, Brooklyn (Ashlee V. Colonna Cohen of counsel), for respondents.
Jacobowitz Newman Tversky LLP, Cedarhurst (Evan M. Newman of counsel), for appellants.
Colonna Cohen law, PLLC, Brooklyn (Ashlee V. Colonna Cohen of counsel), for respondents.
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Webber, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered February 14, 2019, which granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion denied.
Both CPLR 6301 and 6312(a) require a link between a cause of action and a preliminary injunction. There is no such link in the case at bar; hence, plaintiffs' motion should have been denied (see e.g. BSI, LLC v. Toscano, 70 A.D.3d 741, 896 N.Y.S.2d 102 [2d Dept. 2010] ).