From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Henderson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 4, 1967
376 F.2d 840 (6th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 17305.

May 4, 1967.

J. William Rutherford, Nashville, Tenn., for appellant.

Henry C. Foutch, Nashville, Tenn., for appellee. George F. McCanless, Atty. Gen. and Reporter, State of Tennessee, Nashville, Tenn., of counsel.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.


On remand of this petition for habeas corpus, after it was first heard in this court [see Davis v. Johnson, 354 F.2d 689 (C.A.6, 1966)], the District Judge conducted a plenary hearing on petitioner's factual contentions. At the conclusion of that hearing, he found from the evidence that petitioner's claim that he had been deprived of his constitutional right to counsel was not supported by the facts.

Our review of this record convinces us that the evidence amply supports his findings and conclusions of law.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Davis v. Henderson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 4, 1967
376 F.2d 840 (6th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Davis v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:Charles Ralph DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: May 4, 1967

Citations

376 F.2d 840 (6th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

United States ex Rel. Sanders v. State of Ohio

Subsequently in a summary opinion the Court affirmed the District Court's determination that the allegations…