From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 7, 2006
35 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 500506.

December 7, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination of respondent finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting harassment. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. As petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Kalwasinski v Goord, 29 AD3d 1104, 1105; Matter of Hurley v Goord, 28 AD3d 981, 982).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Davis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 7, 2006
35 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Davis v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LARRY DAVIS, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 7, 2006

Citations

35 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 9086
824 N.Y.S.2d 574

Citing Cases

Encarnacion v. Goord

The Attorney General has advised that this determination has since been administratively reversed and all…