From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. FCI Berlin, Warden

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jul 15, 2021
20-cv-599-LM (D.N.H. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-599-LM

07-15-2021

Moses Davis v. FCI Berlin, Warden


ORDER

Landya B. McCafferty Chief Judge

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 24, 2021, dismiss the petition, without prejudice, for lack of savings clause jurisdiction and direct the clerk to enter judgment and close this case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).


Summaries of

Davis v. FCI Berlin, Warden

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jul 15, 2021
20-cv-599-LM (D.N.H. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. FCI Berlin, Warden

Case Details

Full title:Moses Davis v. FCI Berlin, Warden

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

20-cv-599-LM (D.N.H. Jul. 15, 2021)

Citing Cases

Rosado v. AW Wingfield

The few First Circuit courts that have addressed this issue-of whether the substantive law changed such that…