From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davalos v. Davalos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 1954
283 App. Div. 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

February 9, 1954.

Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Breitel and Bastow, JJ. [See post, p. 783.]


Section 240 of the Civil Practice Act does not apply to an attorney who is discharged ( Cann v. Cann, 204 Misc. 1069; Hendry v. Hilton, 283 App. Div. 168). Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Davalos v. Davalos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 1954
283 App. Div. 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Davalos v. Davalos

Case Details

Full title:MARUJA DAVALOS, Respondent, v. ALFONSO DAVALOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 9, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Siegel v. Obes

Furthermore, service upon appellant's attorney of record subsequent to the time that appellant allegedly…

Levine v. City of New York

The record shows that the trial court did entertain the respective applications and heard arguments from both…