From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dass-Gonzalez v. Peterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 1999
258 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 9, 1999

Appeal from the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department.


We agree with Appellate Term that, because the parties' lease contained no provision permitting termination of the tenancy if the landlord deemed the tenants' conduct objectionable, Civil Court was without jurisdiction to entertain the instant summary holdover proceeding ( see, RPAPL 711).

Concur — Williams, J. P., Wallach, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Dass-Gonzalez v. Peterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 1999
258 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Dass-Gonzalez v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:THORA DASS-GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. RICHARD PETERSON et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 9, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 197

Citing Cases

Hatim Grp., LLC v. Johnson

Although the attorney's affirmation indicates that tenant's Section 8 subsidy had been terminated and that…

Rahman v. Lewis

"[a] summary proceeding is a statutory proceeding (see RPAPL art 7), relief can be granted to a petitioner…