From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DARNELL v. BOC GROUP, INC

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 4, 2002
792 A.2d 188 (Del. 2002)

Summary

affirming the Superior Court's decision because: the Industrial Accident's Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's conclusion; and, (b) is free of error of law

Summary of this case from Holben v. Pepsi Bottling Ventures, LLC

Opinion

No. 384, 2001

Decided: March 4, 2002

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 00A-08-006.


Affirmed.

Unpublished opinion is below.

JAMES DARNELL, Claimant Below, Appellant, v. BOC GROUP, INC., Employer Below, Appellee. No. 384, 2001 In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Submitted: February 26, 2002 Decided: March 4, 2002

Before WALSH, HOLLAND and STEELE, Justices.

MYRON T. STEELE, Justice:

ORDER

This 4th day of March, 2002, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, and their contentions in oral argument, it appears to the Court that the Superior Court's opinion should be affirmed because: (a) the Industrial Accident's Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's conclusion; and, (b) is free of error of law.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Superior Court's judgment of July 26, 2001 is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

DARNELL v. BOC GROUP, INC

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 4, 2002
792 A.2d 188 (Del. 2002)

affirming the Superior Court's decision because: the Industrial Accident's Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's conclusion; and, (b) is free of error of law

Summary of this case from Holben v. Pepsi Bottling Ventures, LLC
Case details for

DARNELL v. BOC GROUP, INC

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DARNELL, Claimant Below, Appellant, v. BOC GROUP, INC., Employer…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Mar 4, 2002

Citations

792 A.2d 188 (Del. 2002)

Citing Cases

Holben v. Pepsi Bottling Ventures, LLC

It is most fairly read as an affirmation of the Board's discretion to rely upon a labor market survey when…