From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darling v. Douglas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
Case No: C 09-3798 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Case No: C 09-3798 SBA

03-08-2013

ESTHER DARLING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Dkt. 522, 583

The Court previously referred Plaintiffs' Motion for Enforcement of Stipulated Judgment and for Appointment of Special Master (Dkt. 522) to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley ("the Magistrate") for findings and recommendations. Dkt. 460. On November 20, 2012, the Magistrate issued her report and recommendation in which she recommended denying Plaintiffs' motion. Dkt. 583, 584.

Any objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Civ. L.R. 72-2, 72-3. The district court must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which objection is made," and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Civ. L.R. 72-3(a) (requiring that any objections be accompanied by a motion for de novo determination).

The deadline to file an objection to the report and recommendation was December 4, 2012. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1), 72(b). To date, no objections have been filed in this case. In the absence of a timely objection, the Court "need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory Committee Notes (1983) (citing Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court, 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974)); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) ("The statute [28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)] makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if [an] objection is made, but not otherwise.") (en banc). The Court has reviewed the record on its face and finds no clear error. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Magistrate's report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and shall become the Order of this Court. Plaintiffs' Motion for Enforcement of Stipulated Judgment and for Appointment of Special Master to Magistrate Judge is therefore DENIED. This Order terminates Docket 522 and 583.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________________

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Darling v. Douglas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
Case No: C 09-3798 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Darling v. Douglas

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER DARLING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

Case No: C 09-3798 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)