From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darkins v. Snowden

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 1, 2013
CV 13-3831-JLS (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2013)

Opinion


CHRISTOPHER OJI DARKINS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID SNOWDEN, Defendant. No. CV 13-3831-JLS (MAN) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 1, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint ("Motion") and the parties' related briefing, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Plaintiff's Objection to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those matters to which objections have been stated in writing. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion is GRANTED; (2) the Complaint is dismissed without leaved to amend, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Darkins v. Snowden

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 1, 2013
CV 13-3831-JLS (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Darkins v. Snowden

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER OJI DARKINS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID SNOWDEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 1, 2013

Citations

CV 13-3831-JLS (MAN) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2013)

Citing Cases

Lak v. Cal. Dep't of Child Support Servs.

First, "[t]here is no substantive constitutional right to drive a vehicle." Darkins v. Snowden, No. CV…

Lak v. Cal. Dep't of Child Support Servs.

First, "[t]here is no substantive constitutional right to drive a vehicle." Darkins v. Snowden, No. CV…