From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dapice v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jul 6, 2015
Case No.: 3:13-cv-264 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:13-cv-264

07-06-2015

MICHAEL DAPICE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.



(Consent Case)
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ("EAJA") (DOC. 19); (2) APPROVING THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR EAJA FEES (DOC. 20); AND (3) AWARDING EAJA FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,200.00

The parties unanimously consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Doc. 11. --------

This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation in which they agree that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $5,200.00. EAJA provides for an award of attorney's fees to a party who prevails in a civil action against the United States "when the position taken by the Government is not substantially justified and no special circumstances exist warranting a denial of fees." Bryant v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 578 F.3d 443, 445 (6th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A)). A party who prevails and obtains a Sentence Four remand is a prevailing party for EAJA purposes. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 301-02 (1993). EAJA fees are payable to the litigant. Astrue v. Ratliff, 586 U.S. 586, 589 (2010).

The Court previously found the ALJ's non-disability finding unsupported by substantial evidence and remanded this case to the Commissioner under the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. Doc. 17. Accordingly, Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this case for EAJA purposes and, therefore, is entitled to an award of attorney's fees under EAJA. See Shalala, 509 U.S. at 301-02. Having reviewed the timesheet entries submitted by Plaintiff's counsel, see doc. 19-2 at PageID 1026-27, and considering the nature of the work counsel performed in this case, the Court finds both the hourly fee and the time expended reasonable. Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA fee award in the stipulated amount of $5,200.00.

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Court: (1) APPROVES the parties' joint stipulation for an EAJA fee award (doc. 20); (2) GRANTS Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $5,200.00; and (3) DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's separate motion for attorney's fees under EAJA (doc. 19). As no further matters remain pending for review, this case remains TERMINATED upon the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: July 6, 2015

s/ Michael J . Newman

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Dapice v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jul 6, 2015
Case No.: 3:13-cv-264 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Dapice v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DAPICE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jul 6, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 3:13-cv-264 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

Garrett v. Berryhill

Doing so, the ALJ omitted any meaningful explanation grounded in the regulatory factors for the weight he…