From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danylyk v. City of Euless

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 18, 2022
No. 05-21-01074-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2022)

Opinion

05-21-01074-CV

03-18-2022

MARTA DANYLYK, HELMUT HOFER, AND SOFIJA HOFER, Appellants v. CITY OF EULESS, SELF-INSURED, Appellee


On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-01243-2017

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE.

Seeking to appeal the trial court's interlocutory order denying their plea to the jurisdiction, appellants have filed a petition for permissive appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3.

After considering the petition, response, and reply, we deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(f); Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a); Feagan v. Wilson, No. 11-21-00032-CV, 2021 WL 1134804, at *1-2 (Tex. App.-Eastland Mar. 25, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.).

JUDGMENT

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee City of Euless, Self-Insured recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellants Marta Danylyk, Helmut Hofer, and Sofija Hofer.

Judgment entered.


Summaries of

Danylyk v. City of Euless

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 18, 2022
No. 05-21-01074-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Danylyk v. City of Euless

Case Details

Full title:MARTA DANYLYK, HELMUT HOFER, AND SOFIJA HOFER, Appellants v. CITY OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

No. 05-21-01074-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2022)