Daniels v. State

Full title: Craig B. DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Nov 8, 2012

103 So. 3d 133 (Fla. 2012)

Opinion

No. SC11–1646.

2012-11-8

Craig B. DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal—Direct Conflict of Decisions, First District—Case No. 1D11–969 (Walton County). Carlos Fernando Gonzalez of Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, Miami, FL, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals Division, and Charles Richey McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal—Direct Conflict of Decisions, First District—Case No. 1D11–969 (Walton County).
Carlos Fernando Gonzalez of Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, Miami, FL, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals Division, and Charles Richey McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Daniels v. State, 66 So.3d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), based on express and direct conflict. Seeart. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.