From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 8, 1992
597 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-545.

May 8, 1992.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County; Edward J. Richardson, Judge.

Arnold Ross Daniels, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Daniels appeals from an order summarily denying a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find that the motion does not comply with the requirements of the rule in that there is no mention of any prior appeals or prior post-conviction motions. See Evans v. State, 388 So.2d 1366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

We therefore affirm the trial court on the present record without prejudice to Daniels to file a new motion in conformance with the rules.

We note, however, for the guidance of the trial court, that it failed to attach all necessary documents to its order to justify summary disposition, and one attachment seems contradictory to the court's statement in its order.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 8, 1992
597 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Daniels v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARNOLD ROSS DANIELS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 8, 1992

Citations

597 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Lindsey v. State

AFFIRMED without prejudice to refile a motion per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.850, which complies…

Burns v. State

Appellant may file an amended motion, in compliance with Rule 3.850(c)(3), that states "whether a previous…