From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Reeves

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 9, 1998
712 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

reversing the award of section 57.105 attorney's fees “because the order awarding fees contain[ed] no findings of fact ....”

Summary of this case from Regions Bank v. Gad

Opinion

No. 97-2292

Opinion filed July 9, 1998.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Charles O. Mitchell, Jr., Judge.

James J. Egan, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Jerry G. Traynham of Patterson Traynham, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant seeks review of an order, entered after an order dismissing his third amended complaint with prejudice, directing him to pay attorney fees to appellee, apparently pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1995). Notwithstanding appellant's argument to the contrary, we conclude that the trial court had jurisdiction to address appellee's renewed motion for attorney fees, filed sixteen days after entry of the order dismissing the action. See Ganz v. HZJ, Inc., 605 So.2d 871 (Fla. 1992). However, because the order awarding attorney fees contains no findings of fact, we are constrained to reverse. See, e.g., Glisson v. Jacksonville Transp. Auth., 705 So.2d 136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Fernandez v. Chiro Risk Management, Inc., 700 So.2d 65 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997);Mickler v. Graham, 611 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). On remand, if the trial court again concludes that an award of attorney fees is appropriate, it shall recite in its order the facts upon which it bases that conclusion.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

BARFIELD, C.J.; KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Daniels v. Reeves

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 9, 1998
712 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

reversing the award of section 57.105 attorney's fees “because the order awarding fees contain[ed] no findings of fact ....”

Summary of this case from Regions Bank v. Gad

reversing the award of section 57.105 attorney's fees "because the order awarding fees contain[ed] no findings of fact . . . ."

Summary of this case from Regions Bank v. Gad
Case details for

Daniels v. Reeves

Case Details

Full title:JACK DANIELS, Appellant, v. EVELYN REEVES, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 9, 1998

Citations

712 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Sunset Park Church of God v. Gay

The order awarding attorney's fees contains no findings of fact. Thus we cannot determine how the trial court…

Regions Bank v. Gad

However, because the portion of the order directing Appellant to pay Appellee's attorney's fees pursuant to…