From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Donohue

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2013-10750 Index No. 10399/12.

03-23-2016

Marilyn DANIELS, appellant, v. Rachel DONOHUE, etc., et al., respondents.

Marilyn Daniels, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Elizabeth I. Freedman and Susan Paulson of counsel), for respondents.


Marilyn Daniels, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Elizabeth I. Freedman and Susan Paulson of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Landicino, J.), dated July 5, 2013, which granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the amended complaint and denied, as academic, her cross motion, inter alia, for leave to file a late notice of claim.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the CPLR and the rules of this Court (see CPLR 5528 [a]5; 22 NYCRR 670.10–b[c]1 ).

“An appellant who perfects an appeal by using the appendix method must file an appendix that contains all the relevant portions of the record in order to enable the court to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal” (Matter of Passalacqua, 31 A.D.3d 648, 648, 819 N.Y.S.2d 100 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cohen v. 1651 Carroll Realty Corp., 23 A.D.3d 603, 805 N.Y.S.2d 632; Lucadamo v. Bridge To Life, Inc., 12 A.D.3d 422, 783 N.Y.S.2d 837). Here, the appellant failed to provide this Court with an appendix containing copies of the pleadings, the motion papers, and all of the affidavits and exhibits necessary to review the order appealed from. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

LEVENTHAL, J.P., DICKERSON, DUFFY and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Daniels v. Donohue

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Daniels v. Donohue

Case Details

Full title:Marilyn DANIELS, appellant, v. Rachel DONOHUE, etc., et al., respondents.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2049
26 N.Y.S.3d 888

Citing Cases

Kumar v. Chander

However, the appendix on appeal is insufficient to determine whether the amount of the award was excessive. "…

Edem v. Wondemagegehu

The plaintiff appeals. "An appellant who perfects an appeal by using the appendix method must file an…