From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Feb 19, 2010
CIVIL ACTION 08-00399-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 19, 2010)

Summary

finding that a 100% VA disability determination effective twenty months after the plaintiff's date last insured provided "no evidence that [p]laintiff experienced any functional limitations of any sort prior to his date last insured"

Summary of this case from Forte v. Berryhill

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 08-00399-CG-B.

February 19, 2010


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated February 4, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED


Summaries of

Daniels v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Feb 19, 2010
CIVIL ACTION 08-00399-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 19, 2010)

finding that a 100% VA disability determination effective twenty months after the plaintiff's date last insured provided "no evidence that [p]laintiff experienced any functional limitations of any sort prior to his date last insured"

Summary of this case from Forte v. Berryhill
Case details for

Daniels v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY L. DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 19, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 08-00399-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 19, 2010)

Citing Cases

Forte v. Berryhill

This court has previously found that a lapse in time between the VA disability determination and a…