From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Angelo v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 714 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided June 4, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Margaret Taylor, J.

Carlos J. Cuevas for appellant.

Joseph Bulgatz for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Arnold L. Fein at the Appellate Division ( 106 A.D.2d 128). See also Levine v Long Is. R.R. Co. ( 30 N.Y.2d 907, affg 38 A.D.2d 936, 938). Additionally, we note that estoppel is not available against a governmental agency engaging in the exercise of its governmental functions absent an "unusual factual situation", which does not exist here ( see, Matter of Daleview Nursing Home v Axelrod, 62 N.Y.2d 30, 33).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and TITONE. Taking no part: Judge ALEXANDER.


Summaries of

D'Angelo v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1985
65 N.Y.2d 714 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

D'Angelo v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority

Case Details

Full title:CARMINE D'ANGELO, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Purchasers of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1985

Citations

65 N.Y.2d 714 (N.Y. 1985)
492 N.Y.S.2d 6
481 N.E.2d 546

Citing Cases

Slate v. State

Claimant also advances the argument that the doctrine of estoppel precludes the Comptroller from examining…

Novak Co. v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs. It is well established that "[a]bsent an unusual…