From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danenberg-Jones v. Walmart, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals
Jul 9, 2024
691 S.W.3d 815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

WD 86103

07-09-2024

Marissa DANENBERG-JONES, Appellant, v. WALMART, INC., Respondent.

Mark Everett Parrish, Brianne Thomas, Joshua Alton Sanders, Erica Collins, Independence, MO, for appellant. Sangeeta Shastry, Taylor Markway, Jennifer Jean Artman, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, The Honorable Patrick William Campbell, Judge

Mark Everett Parrish, Brianne Thomas, Joshua Alton Sanders, Erica Collins, Independence, MO, for appellant.

Sangeeta Shastry, Taylor Markway, Jennifer Jean Artman, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Marissa Danenberg-Jones appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment following a jury verdict in favor of Walmart, Inc. on Danenberg-Jones’s claims for personal injury following an attack in the parking lot of a Walmart store located in Shawnee, Kansas. Danenberg-Jones argues that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of emails between Walmart personnel addressing the addition of security in the parking lot after the attack. Danenberg-Jones argues that the emails were admissible under an impeachment exception to the rule barring admission of subsequent remedial measures. Alternatively, Danenberg-Jones argues that the emails were not evidence of a subsequent remedial measure and were independently relevant and admissible. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Danenberg-Jones v. Walmart, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals
Jul 9, 2024
691 S.W.3d 815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Danenberg-Jones v. Walmart, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Marissa DANENBERG-JONES, Appellant, v. WALMART, INC., Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 9, 2024

Citations

691 S.W.3d 815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2024)