From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dancy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 19, 1978
358 So. 2d 60 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-69.

April 18, 1978. Rehearing Denied May 19, 1978.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Richard S. Fuller, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C.J., PEARSON, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.


This appeal has been accepted by this court as a belated appeal pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So.2d 239 (Fla. 1969). The point presented urges error upon the admission of testimony which indicated defendant's involvement in a prior crime. We hold that the testimony met the test of relevancy set forth by the Supreme Court of Florida in Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1959). See also Dempsey v. State, 238 So.2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dancy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 19, 1978
358 So. 2d 60 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Dancy v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD DANCY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 19, 1978

Citations

358 So. 2d 60 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Francois v. Harris

As in Young, the record may well give rise to an inference of fraud or collusion. But since the facts in…