From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dancy v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 9, 2012
1:12-cv-00100-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-cv-00100-KGB-JTK

11-09-2012

MICHAEL DANCY, ADC #152056 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of the proposed findings and recommendations and the objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the proposed findings and recommendations but concludes that, since the dismissals of separate defendants Ray Hobbs and Wendy Kelley are for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, the dismissals should be without prejudice.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that seperate defendants Ray Hobbs and Wendy Kelley are DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice.

_______________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dancy v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 9, 2012
1:12-cv-00100-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Dancy v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DANCY, ADC #152056 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

1:12-cv-00100-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 9, 2012)