From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dan W. Feitel Bag Company, Ltd. v. Bobinski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

December, 1931.


Order denying motion to change place of trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Appeal from order denying defendant's motion for a reargument dismissed, without costs. The action not being one specified in either section 182 or 183 of the Civil Practice Act, and the plaintiff being a foreign corporation and having no residence in the county of Kings within the meaning of section 182 of the Civil Practice Act, the defendant is entitled, as a matter of right, to have the trial of the case in Suffolk county, where he resides. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Sic. See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 183, 184. — [REP.

Amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 493. — [REP.


Summaries of

Dan W. Feitel Bag Company, Ltd. v. Bobinski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Dan W. Feitel Bag Company, Ltd. v. Bobinski

Case Details

Full title:DAN W. FEITEL BAG COMPANY, LTD., Respondent, v. MAXIM BOBINSKI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Petito v. Diesel

Order appealed from, dated March 14, 1960, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motions for…

Meyer v. Anselm Co.

The rule is well established that a foreign corporation authorized to do business in this State is not a…