From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Amico v. Nuzzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1993
194 A.D.2d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 28, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.).


Ordered that on the court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The underlying action was discontinued with prejudice by stipulation dated November 16, 1988. Therefore, no action presently exists to ground the motion made by the nonparty respondent. One who wishes to set aside a settlement made in an action which has been discontinued must proceed by plenary action, and not by motion (see, Coyle v. Barker, 173 A.D.2d 756; cf., Teitelbaum Holdings v. Gold, 48 N.Y.2d 51). Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

D'Amico v. Nuzzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1993
194 A.D.2d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

D'Amico v. Nuzzo

Case Details

Full title:LYNN R. D'AMICO, Plaintiff, v. GERARD V. NUZZO et al., Defendants, SULSKY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 297

Citing Cases

Mercer v. N.Y. Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn

The Supreme Court correctly refused to vacate and set aside the settlement. Because the action was settled…

In re Makowski

By discontinuing an action, "the action is as if it never had been" ( Loeb v Willis, 100 NY 231, 235 [1885];…