From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Amico v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 15, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Sprague, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and O'Donnell, JJ. (Decided Oct. 22, 1985.)


Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition granted. Memorandum: These are combined appeals from two orders upholding the validity of respondents' joint nominating petition in the face of challenges on two separate grounds. We conclude that both orders must be reversed and the petition invalidated.

It is uncontradicted that respondents failed to set forth on the cover sheet of their petition the total number of signatures for each candidate and the pages on which they can be found as required by Election Law § 6-134 (2). For this reason, the motion to invalidate should have been granted (see, Matter of Pecoraro v Mahoney, 65 N.Y.2d 1026).

At the hearing, it was established that in numerous instances the petitioners set forth the village in which a signer resides instead of the "town or city" of residence as required by Election Law § 6-130. Such signatures are invalid (see, Matter of Frome v Board of Elections, 57 N.Y.2d 741, 742; Matter of Scamacca v Mahoney, 104 A.D.2d 730; Matter of Shaughnessy v Herkimer County Bd. of Elections, 104 A.D.2d 731). When these signatures are excluded from the count, the number of valid signatures is insufficient. Thus, the petition must be held invalid on this additional ground.


Summaries of

D'Amico v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

D'Amico v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL D'AMICO et al., Appellants, v. EDWARD J. MAHONEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Sealy v. Vann

Finally, it is significant that the Legislature has not seen fit to amend the subject statute in order to…

Matter of Ligammari v. Norris

We conclude, therefore, that Supreme Court properly invalidated the signatures that failed to comply with…