From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dallas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 19, 2021
1:20-CV-01720 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-CV-01720

11-19-2021

CLEARANCE EDWARD DALLAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [REGARDING ECF NO. 20]

Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge

On October 26, 2021, Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker issued a Report and Recommendation that the Commissioner's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits be affirmed. See ECF No. 20.

The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Parties must file any objections to a Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of service. Id.; Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 72(b)(2). Failure to object within this time waives a party's right to appeal the district court's judgment. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Absent objection, a district court may adopt a magistrate judge's report without review. See Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149.

In the instant case, objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by November (1:20-CV-01720) 9, 2021. The Plaintiff has not filed an Objection.

Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 20.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dallas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 19, 2021
1:20-CV-01720 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Dallas v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:CLEARANCE EDWARD DALLAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 19, 2021

Citations

1:20-CV-01720 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2021)

Citing Cases

Pifer v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Importantly, the ALJ was not required to explicitly use the word “supportability, ” he simply needed to…