From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daley v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 23, 1917
74 So. 843 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)

Opinion

8 Div. 491.

March 23, 1917.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W.W. Haralson, Judge.

John Daley was convicted of an offense, and he appeals. Affirmed.

James C. Phelps and Milo Moody, both of Scottsboro, for appellant. W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The appellant contends that the act approved September 28, 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 940), in so far as it requires the defendant indicted for a misdemeanor to file with the clerk of the court a written demand for trial by jury, is violative of section 6 of the Constitution of 1901, guaranteeing in all criminal prosecutions by indictment the accused shall have a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county or district in which the offense is committed, because it requires the demand to be made in writing. This contention is fully answered in the following cases: Alford v. State ex rel. Attorney General, 170 Ala. 178, 54 So. 213, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 1093; Connelly v. State, 60 Ala. 89, 31 Am. Rep. 34; Ireland v. State, 11 Ala. App. 155, 65 So. 443; Frazier v. State, 11 Ala. App. 285, 66 So. 879.

There was evidence before the court authorizing the conclusion announced in the judgment of guilt, and a new trial was properly denied. Mulligan v. State, 15 Ala. App. 204, 72 So. 761.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Daley v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 23, 1917
74 So. 843 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
Case details for

Daley v. State

Case Details

Full title:DALEY v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 23, 1917

Citations

74 So. 843 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
16 Ala. App. 7

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

It is settled law in Alabama that a jury trial is waived in misdemeanor cases by a failure to demand such a…