From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daker v. Toole

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 2, 2017
138 S. Ct. 234 (2017)

Summary

placing filing restrictions on Plaintiff due to his "repeated[] abuse[]" of the Supreme Court's process

Summary of this case from Daker v. Bryson

Opinion

No. 17–5256.

10-02-2017

Waseem DAKER, petitioner, v. Robert TOOLE, Warden.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).


Summaries of

Daker v. Toole

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 2, 2017
138 S. Ct. 234 (2017)

placing filing restrictions on Plaintiff due to his "repeated[] abuse[]" of the Supreme Court's process

Summary of this case from Daker v. Bryson
Case details for

Daker v. Toole

Case Details

Full title:Waseem DAKER, petitioner, v. Robert TOOLE, Warden.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 2, 2017

Citations

138 S. Ct. 234 (2017)
199 L. Ed. 2d 6

Citing Cases

Daker v. Ward

State and federal courts at all levels have documented Plaintiff's repeated abuses of the judicial process.…

Daker v. Ward

State and federal courts at all levels have documented Plaintiff's repeated abuses of the judicial process.…