From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daines v. Abrams

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 28, 1983
659 P.2d 296 (Nev. 1983)

Opinion

No. 14227

February 28, 1983

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph S. Pavlikowski, Judge.

Robert J. Miller, District Attorney, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Appellant.

Fred H. Abrams, Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


This is an appeal from a judgment awarding respondent Abrams excess compensation in connection with his appointment to represent a certain indigent in a criminal matter. Appellant Daines filed a timely opening brief, but Abrams has not filed an answering brief. On January 24, 1983, we ordered Abrams to show cause why his failure to file a brief should not be treated as a confession of error pursuant to NRAP 31(c). Abrams has filed no brief, nor has he responded to our order to show cause.

Cause appearing, we elect to treat Abrams' conduct as a confession of error. NRAP 31(c); see Smith v. Smith, 98 Nev. 395, 649 P.2d 1374 (1982). Accordingly, the judgment below in Abrams' favor is reversed.


Summaries of

Daines v. Abrams

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 28, 1983
659 P.2d 296 (Nev. 1983)
Case details for

Daines v. Abrams

Case Details

Full title:DARREL R. DAINES, CLARK COUNTY COMPTROLLER, APPELLANT, v. FREDERIC H…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Feb 28, 1983

Citations

659 P.2d 296 (Nev. 1983)
659 P.2d 296

Citing Cases

A. Marcus, Inc. v. Farrow

In some cases, "the reviewing court may reverse the judgment without further explanation of the merits of the…