From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dailey v. Groehnert

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 31, 1934
153 Misc. 427 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

October 31, 1934.

Appeal from the City Court of New York, County of New York.

Herman C. Emer, for the appellant.

William J. Scanlon [ Edward I. Becker of counsel], for the respondent.


A defendant may not be punished for contempt of court under section 753 Jud. of the Judiciary Law for the transfer of his assets during the pendency of a stay which was not sought by him and which was not obtained by any false promise to preserve the status.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, LYDON, CALLAHAN and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Dailey v. Groehnert

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 31, 1934
153 Misc. 427 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Dailey v. Groehnert

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD J. DAILEY, Respondent, v. LOUIS GROEHNERT, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1934

Citations

153 Misc. 427 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
275 N.Y.S. 257

Citing Cases

Fass & Wolper, Inc. v. Burns

The question is whether, under the circumstances, the making of the assignment constitutes a contempt of…