From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dade County v. Michigan Mutual Liability Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 9, 1964
169 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33559.

December 9, 1964.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, George E. Schulz, J.

Bolles, Prunty, Martin Goodwin and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for appellant.

Patton Kanner and Welsh, Cornell, Pyszka Carlton, Miami, for appellees.


There has been filed in this cause a suggestion of recusal by the attorneys for appellant. The suggestion is that during my term as Attorney General of the State of Florida I rendered an opinion pled by the appellees in the complaint on one of the points involved in this litigation. During the fifteen years which I served as Attorney General of Florida I rendered several thousand opinions. Obviously my services on the Court as an incumbent Justice thereof would be greatly impaired if it were incumbent upon me to disqualify myself in cases where issues were raised concerning the same subjects on which I expressed opinions while Attorney General. Accordingly for these reasons I must, and do, decline to recuse myself. See Section 30-A Am.Jur., Judges, Sections 169 et seq., and 48 C.J.S. Judges §§ 82, 83, 89, pages 1062, 1063, 1068, 1069, 1076 and 1077.


The foregoing declination to recuse himself filed in this cause by Justice Ervin is hereby agreed to and approved.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dade County v. Michigan Mutual Liability Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 9, 1964
169 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Dade County v. Michigan Mutual Liability Company

Case Details

Full title:DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, A BODY CORPORATE AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 9, 1964

Citations

169 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1964)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Gerstein v. Stedman

Assistant State Attorney Markowitz deposed that "To the best of Affiant's memory and knowledge Judge Carling…

Department of Revenue v. Golder

This view is consistent with the view of this Court regarding the responsibility of a judge in like…