From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D. W. Winkelman Co., Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 7, 1960
10 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

April 7, 1960

Appeal from the Court of Claims.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ. [ 17 Misc.2d 418.]


Judgment unanimously modified upon the law and facts to provide that claimant recover against the State of New York interest on the severed sum of $208,981.63 from March 13, 1956 to July 9, 1956 and, as to modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Upon this record, we find that the award in the sum of $120,000 for breach of contract was proper, but the interest on the original contract balance should be modified. The work under the contract between the parties to this proceeding was accepted by appellant on December 20, 1955. The State on March 13, 1956 sent to respondent the final agreement and estimate which was returned unsigned on April 27, 1956. The claim for breach of contract was filed on June 1, 1956 and on July 9, 1956 the claimant moved to amend its claim by adding thereto the sum of $208,981.63 — the amount of the final estimate. The motion was granted and an order of severance granted awarding claimant judgment for the amount of the final estimate, the interest thereon, if any, to be determined upon the trial. No proof upon this phase of the case was submitted upon the trial but the court found that claimant was entitled to interest on the severed sum from the date of acceptance of the work to the date of payment. Upon this appeal the respondent in substance concedes that the interest should be computed from a date 60 days after acceptance of the work, which would allow the State 60 days' grace from the accepted performance of the work (cf. Rusciano Son Corp. v. State of New York, 278 App. Div. 999). However, we find in this record no proof as to whether the period of 60 days was reasonable or unreasonable (cf. Rusciano Son Corp. v. State of New York, 201 Misc. 690, 705). We conclude that interest upon the severed sum should be computed from March 13, 1956 — the date appellant sent to respondent the final agreement and estimate.


Summaries of

D. W. Winkelman Co., Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 7, 1960
10 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

D. W. Winkelman Co., Inc. v. State

Case Details

Full title:D. W. WINKELMAN CO., INC., Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1960

Citations

10 A.D.2d 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

Yonkers Contr. Co. v. N.Y.S. Thruway Auth

However, the State (or other party to be charged) has many times been allowed additional time, where it is…

Yonkers Contr. v. New York St. Thruway Auth

We now hold that interest on the disputed claims allowed should not be awarded therefor prior to the date of…