From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Czarnikow Rionda v. Ellerman Bucknall S.S

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 2, 1936
81 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1936)

Opinion

No. 234.

March 2, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Macklin, Brown, Lenahan Speer, of New York City (Paul Speer, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants Standard-Vacuum Transp. Co. and the lighter Socony No. 175.

Bigham, Englar, Jones Houston, of New York City (Leonard J. Matteson and Richard F. Shaw, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelants.

Purdy Purdy, of New York City (Frank C. Mason, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Manhattan Lighterage Corp. and Flower Lighterage Co., Inc.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating McGrann, of New York City (L. De Grove Potter and Wm. H. Postner, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondents Ellerman Bucknall S.S. Co., Ltd., and Norton, Lilly Co.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


Decree ( 11 F. Supp. 109) affirmed.


Summaries of

Czarnikow Rionda v. Ellerman Bucknall S.S

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 2, 1936
81 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1936)
Case details for

Czarnikow Rionda v. Ellerman Bucknall S.S

Case Details

Full title:CZARNIKOW RIONDA COMPANY, Companie Cubana, and William R. Pinner and…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 2, 1936

Citations

81 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1936)

Citing Cases

Steuart Investment Co. v. Bauer Dredging Const. Co.

A tow may be held responsible when it is shown that it was at fault in addition to the tug being negligent.…

Deep Sea Tankers v. The Long Branch

Moreover, if fault is attributable to more than one of the vessels engaged in a common venture or enterprise,…