From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Ark. State Plant Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 16, 2013
No. 4:11-cv-195 KGB (E.D. Ark. Jul. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 4:11-cv-195 KGB

07-16-2013

RAY CURTIS PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Opinion and Order entered on July 15, 2013, plaintiff Ray Curtis's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and his state-law breach of contract claims against his former employer, the Arkansas State Plant Board, are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

_______________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Curtis v. Ark. State Plant Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 16, 2013
No. 4:11-cv-195 KGB (E.D. Ark. Jul. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Curtis v. Ark. State Plant Bd.

Case Details

Full title:RAY CURTIS PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 16, 2013

Citations

No. 4:11-cv-195 KGB (E.D. Ark. Jul. 16, 2013)