From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Episcopal Health Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1998
248 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 30, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when she slipped and fell in a puddle of water in the appellants' cafeteria. The plaintiff subsequently, without counsel, signed a general release in return for the payment to her of $832, an amount reflecting 10 days lost earnings, computed at a rate of $10.40 per hour, based on an 8-hour day. A representative of the appellants acknowledged that the sum of $832, coupled with the appellants' waiver of any amount due to them for the emergency room treatment received by the plaintiff, would have represented fair compensation, but only if the plaintiff's injuries had consisted of these lost wages, and nothing more (see, Best v. Yutaka, 90 N.Y.2d 833). Further, it was not until after the release had been signed that the plaintiff was diagnosed as having incurred an "annular tear" and related injuries to her back, which were more serious than the injuries originally suspected. Under these and all the other particular circumstances revealed in the present record, we find that the Supreme Court properly set aside the release on the ground of mutual mistake (see, e.g., Best v. Yutaka, supra; Mangini v. McClurg, 24 N.Y.2d 556; Carola v. NKO Contr. Corp., 205 A.D.2d 931; Horn v. Timmons, 180 A.D.2d 717; Pokora v. Albergo, 130 A.D.2d 473; see also, Wheeler v. State of New York, 286 App. Div. 310).

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Miller and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curry v. Episcopal Health Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1998
248 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Curry v. Episcopal Health Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER L. CURRY, Respondent, v. EPISCOPAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 590

Citing Cases

Sukhu v. Marajh

Plaintiff, on his cross motion, alleges that the release was intended to apply only to the property damage,…

Rojas v. Family Dollar Stores of N.Y., Inc.

The validity of any purported release is further called into question as it is unclear if the purported…