From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curley v. Richards

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Nov 7, 1924
69 Cal.App. 798 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2784.

November 7, 1924.

APPEAL from judgments of the Superior Court of Butte County. H. D. Gregory, Judge. Reversed.

The questions involved are the same as those considered in Nielsen v. Richards, ante, p. 533.

Ware Ware for Appellant.

Edward T. Bishop, County Counsel, J. H. O'Connor, Assistant County Counsel, and Roy W. Dowds, Deputy County Counsel, Amici Curiae in support of Appellant's position.

Wm. E. Rothe, District Attorney, and C. W. Johnson, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.


The questions involved in this case are the same as those considered in Nielsen v. Richards, ante, p. 533 [ 232 P. 480]. On the authority of that case the judgments herein are reversed, with directions to the trial court to overrule the demurrer to the petition.

A petition by respondent to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on January 5, 1925.


Summaries of

Curley v. Richards

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Nov 7, 1924
69 Cal.App. 798 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924)
Case details for

Curley v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:A. W. CURLEY, Appellant, v. LUCY V. RICHARDS, etc., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Nov 7, 1924

Citations

69 Cal.App. 798 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924)
232 P. 486

Citing Cases

Pittsburg Unified School District v. S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.

) This legislation was enacted in response to Zurn Engineers v. State of California ex rel. Dept. Water…