From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cuprowski v. City

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 16, 1968
103 N.J. Super. 217 (App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

Argued October 8, 1968 —

Decided October 16, 1968.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Law Division, Hudson County, whose opinion is reported in 101 N.J. Super. 15.

Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

Mr. Gerold Kanengiser argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Gordon and Kanengiser, attorneys).

Mr. James F. Ryan argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Francis X. Hayes, of counsel).


The judgment dismissing plaintiffs' proceeding in lieu of prerogative writs, which sought a referendum to reject the 1968 budget adopted by the City of Jersey City, is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Artaserse in his opinion reported at 101 N.J. Super. 15 ( Law Div. 1968).


Summaries of

Cuprowski v. City

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 16, 1968
103 N.J. Super. 217 (App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Cuprowski v. City

Case Details

Full title:PAUL CUPROWSKI, MARY E. VERDIRANO, JAMES J. MACK, FRANK S. MONACO, AND…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 16, 1968

Citations

103 N.J. Super. 217 (App. Div. 1968)
247 A.2d 28

Citing Cases

D'Ercole v. Mayor of Norwood

It is well established that only enactments of a legislative nature are proper subjects of referendum. Smith…

We the People Committee, Inc. v. City of Elizabeth

We have liberally construed this statutory provision to promote the salutary objective of popular…