From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Nov 1, 1880
57 Cal. 148 (Cal. 1880)

Opinion

         Department One

         The petition stated that the defendant had made an order admitting a will to probate, and afterwards vacated the same upon the hearing of a petition of certain heirs claiming that the alleged will had been revoked by testatrix.

         COUNSEL

          S. M. Wilson, for Plaintiff.

         B. S. Brooks, for Defendant.


         JUDGES: [Justice McKinstry disqualified, Justice McKee not sitting, Justice Sharpstein dissenting.]

         OPINION

         In Bank.

         The Court:

         Upon the authority of Goodale v. The Fifteenth District Court , 56 Cal. 26, writ dismissed.


Summaries of

Cunningham v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Nov 1, 1880
57 Cal. 148 (Cal. 1880)
Case details for

Cunningham v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:P. CUNNINGHAM v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 1, 1880

Citations

57 Cal. 148 (Cal. 1880)

Citing Cases

Mesnager v. De Leonis

The court had jurisdiction to appoint a receiver. (Goodale v.District Court, 56 Cal. 26; Shimmins v. District…

Fischer v. Superior Court of County of Tuolumne

As the court had the power to appoint a receiver, the appellate court cannot on writ of prohibition inquire…