From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cunningham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 25, 1971
471 S.W.2d 777 (Ark. 1971)

Opinion

No. 5650.

Opinion delivered October 25, 1971

CRIMINAL LAW — POSTCONVICTION RELIEF — FAILURE TO SHOW PREJUDICE. — Asserted denial of a fair trial because prosecutor threatened State's witness with perjury if she did not tell the truth held without merit where prejudice could not have resulted from State's witness telling the truth on the witness stand.

Appeal from Mississippi Circuit Court, A. S. "Todd" Harrison, Judge; affirmed.

Dana Davis, for appellant.

Ray Thornton, Attorney General, for appellee.


The only point raised in this appeal from the trial court's denial of appellant Rudolph Cunningham's post conviction relief is the assertion that he was denied a, fair trial because the deputy prosecuting attorney threatened one of the State's witnesses with perjury if she did not tell the truth. The witness, a relative of petitioner, testified that though the threat was made, she only told the truth and nothing but the truth.

We find no merit in the contention.

Affirmed.

FOGLEMAN, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Cunningham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 25, 1971
471 S.W.2d 777 (Ark. 1971)
Case details for

Cunningham v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUDOLPH CUNNINGHAM v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 25, 1971

Citations

471 S.W.2d 777 (Ark. 1971)
251 Ark. 277

Citing Cases

Worth v. Civil Serv. Comm'n

Nothing in Bradley v. Bruce suggests that retroactive application was intended and we do not, as a rule,…